![]() An egregious example of this would be copying someone outside the company on a professional matter relevant to the company, to give them insider information. It’s also a bad idea to use BCC as a way to clue someone into something they have no business seeing. Including an inappropriate eavesdropper.Again, if there’s a big enough issue that you need someone higher up to get involved, contact them directly and be straightforward and polite about it. BCCing doesn’t make this any better you’re still being petty, and the boss will still see you as spiteful. For example, you might point out a mistake they made or a professional fault of theirs so their boss will reprimand them. The basic idea is including someone’s boss or supervisor in the CC field as a way to make them look bad. Copying up is a problem with CC, and it’s an even bigger problem when you use BCC. It’s almost like letting someone listen into a speakerphone call without letting the other person know about it.Īccordingly, there are many examples of misusing the BCC feature: If you think about it, the BCC field is inherently dishonest you’re letting people see a message without other people knowing about it. That said, BCC can be misused in a number of ways. If you’re introducing a conversational topic and you want someone to know that the conversation has begun-but you don’t want them wrapped up in the thread that’s about to follow-consider BCCing them. Because BCC protects a person from the threat of future Reply All messages, it’s a great way to keep someone copied while sparing them the confusion and annoyance of further responses. Sparing someone from a lengthy thread.BCCing your boss will keep them in the loop without accidentally revealing their information to the new person. However, you don’t want this new contact to have your boss’s contact information. ![]() For example, let’s say you’re networking and you’d like your boss to see your initial message. BCC could also be useful for copying someone if you want to maintain their privacy. Using BCC not only protects the privacy of your guests, but also prevents any Reply All-related mishaps. These people may or may not know each other, and you certainly don’t want these recipients to mindlessly hit Reply All and send a notification to dozens of individuals on the list. Let’s say you’re sending an email to a large group of people, all at once, like an invitation to an event. There are a few situations that might call for it: So why would you use BCC instead of either of these fields? The CC field is for all the people who should see the message, and whose email addresses can and should be seen by the group it’s also helpful if you want these people to get future Reply All messages to this email thread.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |